FBIAS™ Fact Based Investment Allocation Strategies for the week ending 10/24/2014

The very big picture:

In the “decades” timeframe, we have been in a Secular Bear Market which began in 2000 when the P/E ratio (using Shiller’s Cyclically-Adjusted P/E, or “CAPE”) peaked at about 44.  The job of Secular Bear markets is to burn off outrageously high P/E ratios over one or two decades, until finally the P/E ratio arrives back at a single-digit level, from which another Secular Bull Market can emerge.  See graph below for the 100-year view of this repeating process.

If history is a guide, we may not yet be done with this Secular Bear Market.  The Shiller P/E is at 25.7, up from the prior week’s 24.7, and approximately at the level reached at the pre-crash high in October, 2007.  Even though P/E’s are substantially lower than their crazy peak in 2000, they are nonetheless at the high end of the normal historical range and leave little if any room for expansion.  This means that the stock market is unlikely to make gains greater than corporate profit growth percentage, if that.  (note: all P/E references are to the Shiller P/E values, sometimes called PE10 or CAPE, which are calculated so as to remove shorter-term fluctuations; see robertshiller.com for details).

In fact, since 1881, the average annual returns for all ten year periods that began with a CAPE at this level have been just 3%/yr (see graph below).

This further means that above-average returns will be much more likely to come from the active management of portfolios than from passive buy-and-hold.  Although a mania could come along and cause P/E’s to shoot upward from current levels (such as happened in the late 1920’s and the late 1990’s), in the absence of such a mania, buy-and-hold investors will likely have a long wait until the arrival of returns typical of a Secular Bull Market.

In the big picture:

The “big picture” is the months-to-years timeframe – the timeframe in which Cyclical Bulls and Bears operate.  The US Bull-Bear Indicator (see graph below) is at 52.6, up from the prior week’s 51.4, and continues in cyclical Bull territory.  The current Cyclical Bull has taken the US and some of Europe to new all-time highs, but many of the world’s major indices have yet to top 2007’s levels.  The most widely followed international indexes, the Morgan Stanley EAFE Developed International index and the Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Index, are both still below their 2007 peaks.

In the intermediate picture:

The intermediate (weeks to months) indicator (see graph below) is Positive and ended the week at 10, up sharply from the prior week’s 3.  Separately, the quarter-by-quarter indicator – based on domestic and international stock trend status at the start of each quarter – gave a positive indication on the first day of October for the prospects for the fourth quarter of 2014.

Timeframe summary:

In the Secular (years to decades) timeframe (Figs. 1 & 2 above), the Secular Bear may still be in force as the long-term valuation of the market is simply too high to sustain a new rip-roaring Secular Bull.  In the Cyclical (months to years) timeframe (Fig. 3 above), all major equity markets are in Cyclical Bull territory.  The Bond market returned to Cyclical Bull territory as of February 28th.  In the Intermediate (weeks to months) timeframe (Fig. 4 above), US equity markets returned to Positive status on October 17th.  The quarter-by-quarter indicator gave a positive signal for the 4th quarter:  US equities were in an uptrend, while International equities were in a downtrend at the start of Q4, and either one being in an uptrend is sufficient to signal a higher likelihood of an up quarter than a down quarter. 

In the markets:

The US led a rally of most world markets from oversold levels, with the S&P 500 rocketing +4.1% higher for the biggest weekly gain in a year and a half, and the Nasdaq enjoyed its biggest weekly gain (+5.3%) since 2011.  Non-US markets were much more subdued, however.  Canada’s TSX climbed +2.2% for the week, Developed International +2.6%, but Emerging Markets rose just +0.7% (Brazil’s large -7.8% decline held it in check).  The US SmallCap Russell 2000 index is still negative for the year to date, at -3.9%, as are both Developed International and Emerging International indices.  Canada’s TSX earlier this year enjoyed a 7% lead over the US in year-to-date returns, but that has shrunk to only a 0.5% advantage as Canada’s correction was sharper and deeper than the US’s pullback.

US interest rates have fallen recently to a 1-1/2 year low, and mortgage refinance applications jumped +23.3% week-over-week in response.   Existing home sales rose to 5.17 million annualized, the highest since September 2013, though new home sales were flat.  Inflation data as represented by the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) also was tame, with the CPI in September up just +0.1%, while the 12-month CPI was only +1.7%.  Earnings from US companies were mixed during the week, with many old-line stalwarts disappointing.  AT&T, Walmart, IBM, Coca-Cola, GE, among others did not meet expectations, but giant industrials Caterpillar and 3M reported upside surprises.  A third of the 30 companies in the Dow Jones Industrial Average have posted shrinking or flat revenue over the past 12 months, according to data from S&P Capital IQ.  Revenue growth for nearly half the Dow Industrials didn’t outpace the U.S. inflation rate of +1.7%.  It might be logical to think that the large multinationals would be reeling from the effects of European stagnation, but data from the World Bank show that Europe represents just 15% of total US foreign trade.

Canadian retail sales dropped unexpectedly in August, the second consecutive month of falling retail sales, casting some uncertainty on prospects for broader economic growth.  Retail sales dropped -0.3 percent in August, Statistics Canada said on Wednesday.  Analysts had forecast that sales would be unchanged from July.  It wasn’t all just lower gas prices, as sales were down in 7 of the 11 sub-sectors, representing 76 percent of retail trade.

Eurozone stagnation continues.  The October manufacturing Purchasing Managers Index (“PMI”) was 50.7 vs 50.3 in September, barely in expansion territory.  The service sector reading of 52.4 was unchanged over the prior month.  The specifics for Germany and France were not enthusing.   Germany’s manufacturing reading was 51.8 vs 49.9, services 54.8 vs 55.7, and a composite of the two 53.6 vs 54.1. For France, manufacturing was 47.3 in October vs 48.8 the prior month, services was 48.1 vs 48.4, and the composite of the two 48.0 vs. 48.4.

In China, GDP was reported at +7.3% in the third quarter, the weakest pace since Q1 2009, though it beat the estimate of 7.2%.  Producer, or “factory-gate”, prices fell in September for an amazing 32nd straight month.  In the critical housing sector, new-home prices fell in 69 of 70 Chinese cities monitored by the government in September from August, the most since January 2011. Nationwide, home sales fell -11% in the first nine months of the year.  Prices in the previously-overheated Beijing and Shanghai markets fell -0.7% and -0.9% respectively.  The city of Xiamen in Fujian province was the only one of the 70 cities surveyed to show an increase.

Casino revenue in the Chinese gambling mecca Macau, always a good economic barometer for China, fell -12% in September, the fourth straight month of decline, and the biggest drop since June 2009. A significant part of the decline is suspected to be the result of Chinese President Xi’s crackdown on corruption among government officials.  Beijing reported spending by officials on trips (including to Macau), lavish receptions and official cars has dropped by almost $9 billion over the past year.  The government also announced it had found and eliminated 150,000 ‘ghost jobs’, where people are paid without ever being required to show up.

As domestic West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”) crude oil hovers above $80/bbl, and foreign Brent Crude a bit higher, many energy-producing countries are facing the reality of large budgetary shortfalls vs their planned revenues that relied on much higher oil prices.  Here is a chart from Deutsche Bank that shows how many previously comfortable sovereign budgets have been thrown into turmoil by the significant slide in world oil prices.

(sources: Reuters, Barron’s, Wall St Journal, Bloomberg.com, ft.com, guggenheimpartners.com, ritholtz.com, markit.com, financialpost.com, Eurostat, Statistics Canada, Yahoo! Finance, stocksandnews.com, wantchinatimes.com, BBC, 361capital.com, S China Morning Post)

The ranking relationship (see graph below) between the defensive SHUT sectors (“S”=Staples [a.k.a. consumer non-cyclical], “H”=Healthcare, “U”=Utilities and “T”=Telecom) and the offensive DIME sectors (“D”=Discretionary [a.k.a. Consumer Cyclical], “I”=Industrial, “M”=Materials, “E”=Energy), is one way to gauge institutional investor sentiment in the market.

The average ranking of Defensive SHUT sectors rose to 6.0 from the prior week’s 6.5, while the average ranking of Offensive DIME sectors rose to 19 from the prior week’s 20.3. Institutional investors remain cautious, and the Defensive SHUT group continues to rank substantially higher than the Offensive DIME group ranking.                                                                                                                                                                                                                            

Note: these are “ranks”, not “scores”, so smaller numbers are higher ranks and larger numbers are lower ranks.

Summary:

The US has led the worldwide recovery, and continues to be among the strongest of global markets.  However, the over-arching Secular Bear Market may remain in place even as new highs are reached in the US.

Because we may still be in a Secular Bear, we have no expectations of runs of multiple double-digit consecutive years, and we expect poor market conditions to be a frequent occurrence.  Nonetheless, we remain completely open to any eventuality that the market brings, and our strategies, tactics and tools will help us to successfully navigate whatever happens.

FBIAS™ Fact Based Investment Allocation Strategies for the week ending 10/17/2014

The very big picture:

In the “decades” timeframe, we have been in a Secular Bear Market which began in 2000 when the P/E ratio (using Shiller’s Cyclically-Adjusted P/E, or “CAPE”) peaked at about 44.  The job of Secular Bear markets is to burn off outrageously high P/E ratios over one or two decades, until finally the P/E ratio arrives back at a single-digit level, from which another Secular Bull Market can emerge.  See graph below for the 100-year view of this repeating process.

If history is a guide, we may not yet be done with this Secular Bear Market.  The Shiller P/E is at 24.7, down from the prior week’s 25.0, and approximately at the level reached at the pre-crash high in October, 2007.  Even though P/E’s are substantially lower than their crazy peak in 2000, they are nonetheless at the high end of the normal historical range and leave little if any room for expansion.  This means that the stock market is unlikely to make gains greater than corporate profit growth percentage, if that.  (note: all P/E references are to the Shiller P/E values, sometimes called PE10 or CAPE, which are calculated so as to remove shorter-term fluctuations; see robertshiller.com for details).

In fact, since 1881, the average annual returns for all ten year periods that began with a CAPE at this level have been just 3%/yr (see graph below).

This further means that above-average returns will be much more likely to come from the active management of portfolios than from passive buy-and-hold.  Although a mania could come along and cause P/E’s to shoot upward from current levels (such as happened in the late 1920’s and the late 1990’s), in the absence of such a mania, buy-and-hold investors will likely have a long wait until the arrival of returns typical of a Secular Bull Market.

In the big picture:

The “big picture” is the months-to-years timeframe – the timeframe in which Cyclical Bulls and Bears operate.  The US Bull-Bear Indicator (see graph below) is at 51.4, down from the prior week’s 55.1, and continues in cyclical Bull territory.  The current Cyclical Bull has taken the US and some of Europe to new all-time highs, but many of the world’s major indices have yet to top 2007’s levels.  The most widely followed international indexes, the Morgan Stanley EAFE Developed International index and the Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Index, are both still below their 2007 peaks.

In the intermediate picture:

The intermediate (weeks to months) indicator (see graph below) ended the week at 3, down from the prior week’s 7, but up from the low of 2 – enough to switch the indicator back to Positive status.  Separately, the quarter-by-quarter indicator – based on domestic and international stock trend status at the start of each quarter – gave a positive indication on the first day of October for the prospects for the fourth quarter of 2014.

Timeframe summary:

In the Secular (years to decades) timeframe (Figs. 1 & 2 above), the Secular Bear may still be in force as the long-term valuation of the market is simply too high to sustain a new rip-roaring Secular Bull.  In the Cyclical (months to years) timeframe (Fig. 3 above), all major equity markets are in Cyclical Bull territory.  The Bond market returned to Cyclical Bull territory as of February 28th.  In the Intermediate (weeks to months) timeframe (Fig. 4 above), US equity markets returned to Positive status on October 17th.  The quarter-by-quarter indicator gave a positive signal for the 4th quarter:  US equities were in an uptrend, while International equities were in a downtrend at the start of Q4, and either one being in an uptrend is sufficient to signal a higher likelihood of an up quarter than a down quarter. 

In the markets:

A roller-coaster week was experienced in worldwide markets.  You know it is a wild one when investors breathe a sigh a relief that the Dow was only down -173 on Wednesday – since it had been down more than -450 earlier in the day!  Thanks to a strong positive showing on Friday, though, with markets around the globe rallying +1% to +3%, some indices actually finished higher on the week.  The week nonetheless saw many markets enter “correction” territory (a 10% decline from prior highs) and still others enter “bear” territory (a 20% decline from prior highs) before Friday’s bounce.  Among markets reaching “correction” territory are Canada, UK, Spain, S Korea, Australia, China, Japan, US SmallCap and US MidCap.  Among markets that hit “bear” territory are Germany, Italy and Brazil, as well as a number of sectors such as Homebuilders, Precious Metals Miners, and Semiconductors.

In the US, the indices that had been hardest-hit in recent weeks performed the best this week.  SmallCaps gained +2.8%, thereby avoiding what would have been a record 7th losing week in a row.  MidCaps also did well, rising +1.3%, but the rest of US indices lost ground, with the Dow and S&P 500 both retreating -1%.  Like the US SmallCaps, Canada’s TSX avoided a 7th consecutive losing week, but only barely, finishing essentially unchanged on the week.  Both Developed and Emerging International groups gained on the week, at +0.4% and +0.5% respectively, even though European stocks had declined eight consecutive days through Thursday – their longest losing streak since 2003.  China led the Emerging International group (+1.4%) while Germany paced the Developed International group (+1.7%).

Although earnings news dominated the headlines (with some notable “misses” – Google and Netflix among them – but also some big “hits” from industrial giants GE and Honeywell), US economic news was neutral to positive on balance.  Initial jobless claims came in at 264,000, the lowest number since 2000.  Gasoline prices have fallen significantly, and are the lowest in three years, effectively giving every driver a bonus.  The University of Michigan consumer confidence survey was reported at 86.4, the highest since before the “great recession”.   The Philadelphia Fed index of manufacturing activity was reported at 20.7, remaining in the good growth range.  Spurred by mortgage rates back to 4% and lower, refinance applications rose +10.6% week-over-week to the highest level in 4 months.  On the negative side, retail sales were down -0.3%, the National Association of Home Builder’s housing market index fell to 54, down from 59 last month and unchanged year-over-year, and the National Federation of Independent Business small business optimism index fell to a 3-month low.

Canada’s manufacturing output dropped for the first time this year, -3.3%, reversing July’s rise to record levels.  A Thomson-Reuters survey of economists had expected a much smaller drop of -1.6%.  Manufacturing output had been trending higher all year, but August’s sharp drop has essentially wiped out the gains of June and July.

Eurostats, the statistical arm of the European Union, released its inflation data for September and for the 18 Eurozone nations it was up just +0.3% on an annual basis.  By contrast, in September 2013 the inflation rate was +1.3%, a value the European Central Bank can only dream about today.  Prices are dangerously falling in some Eurozone countries.  Prices were down -1.1% in Greece, down -0.3% in Spain (after being down -0.5% in August and -0.4% in July), down -0.4% in Sweden and down -0.1% in Italy.  Deflation fears are well founded, it appears.  Eurozone industrial production was also released for August, down -1.8% over July and down -1.9% year-over-year.  The U.K. had some positive news, reporting an unemployment rate of just 6.0%, a six-year low, for the three months thru August.

In China, September exports were reported to have risen a better than expected +15.3%, with imports also exceeding expectations, up +7%, but the exports number was strong enough to arouse suspicions of fake invoices among some observers, despite the government’s assurances that such past chicanery is now under control.  Credit Suisse’s “Global Wealth Report 2014” places China as the fourth wealthiest region in the world and said that the country’s middle class, which has doubled since 2000, now makes up an amazing one third of the world’s total middle class population.

Economists and statisticians routinely deal with correlated data points.  A constant – and critically important – question to ask when pondering a correlation is “does this correlation arise from coincidence or causation?”  Here’s one that only the bravest would take on – two Emory University economists have discovered that there is a very high correlation between total wedding expenses and the subsequent likelihood of divorce.  Is it Coincidence or Causation?

(sources: Reuters, Barron’s, Wall St Journal, Bloomberg.com, ft.com, guggenheimpartners.com, ritholtz.com, markit.com, financialpost.com, Eurostat, Statistics Canada, Yahoo! Finance, stocksandnews.com, wantchinatimes.com, BBC, 361capital.com, S China Morning Post)

The ranking relationship (shown in the graph below) between the defensive SHUT sectors (“S”=Staples [a.k.a. consumer non-cyclical], “H”=Healthcare, “U”=Utilities and “T”=Telecom) and the offensive DIME sectors (“D”=Discretionary [a.k.a. Consumer Cyclical], “I”=Industrial, “M”=Materials, “E”=Energy), is one way to gauge institutional investor sentiment in the market.

The average ranking of Defensive SHUT sectors declined to 6.5 from the prior week’s 5.8, while the average ranking of Offensive DIME sectors fell sharply to 20.3 from the prior week’s 17.3.  Institutional investors remain cautious, and the Defensive SHUT group ranks higher than the Offensive DIME group ranking by the widest margin in more than a year.                                                                                                                                                                                                                            

Note: these are “ranks”, not “scores”, so smaller numbers are higher ranks and larger numbers are lower ranks.

Summary:

The US has led the worldwide recovery, and continues to be among the strongest of global markets.  However, the over-arching Secular Bear Market may remain in place even as new highs are reached in the US.

Because we may still be in a Secular Bear, we have no expectations of runs of multiple double-digit consecutive years, and we expect poor market conditions to be a frequent occurrence.  Nonetheless, we remain completely open to any eventuality that the market brings, and our strategies, tactics and tools will help us to successfully navigate whatever happens.

FBIAS™ Fact Based Investment Allocation Strategies for the week ending 10/3/2014

The very big picture:

In the “decades” timeframe, we have been in a Secular Bear Market which began in 2000 when the P/E ratio (using Shiller’s Cyclically-Adjusted P/E, or “CAPE”) peaked at about 44.  The job of Secular Bear markets is to burn off outrageously high P/E ratios over one or two decades, until finally the P/E ratio arrives back at a single-digit level, from which another Secular Bull Market can emerge.  See graph below for the 100-year view of this repeating process.

If history is a guide, we may not yet be done with this Secular Bear Market.  The Shiller P/E is at 26.1, down from the prior week’s 26.3, and approximately at the level reached at the pre-crash high in October, 2007.  Even though P/E’s are substantially lower than their crazy peak in 2000, they are nonetheless at the high end of the normal historical range and leave little if any room for expansion.  This means that the stock market is unlikely to make gains greater than corporate profit growth percentage, if that.  (note: all P/E references are to the Shiller P/E values, sometimes called PE10 or CAPE, which are calculated so as to remove shorter-term fluctuations; see robertshiller.com for details).

In fact, since 1881, the average annual returns for all ten year periods that began with a CAPE at this level have been just 3%/yr (see graph below).

This further means that above-average returns will be much more likely to come from the active management of portfolios than from passive buy-and-hold.  Although a mania could come along and cause P/E’s to shoot upward from current levels (such as happened in the late 1920’s and the late 1990’s), in the absence of such a mania, buy-and-hold investors will likely have a long wait until the arrival of returns typical of a Secular Bull Market.

In the big picture:

The “big picture” is the months-to-years timeframe – the timeframe in which Cyclical Bulls and Bears operate.  The US Bull-Bear Indicator (see graph below) is at 58.8, down from the prior week’s 62.0, and continues in cyclical Bull territory.  The current Cyclical Bull has taken the US and some of Europe to new all-time highs, but many of the world’s major indices have yet to top 2007’s levels.  The most widely followed international indexes, the Morgan Stanley EAFE Developed International index and the Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Index, are both still below their 2007 peaks.

In the intermediate picture:

The intermediate (weeks to months) indicator (see graph below) ended the week at 16, down 7 from the prior week’s 23, and in Negative status.  Separately, the quarter-by-quarter indicator – based on domestic and international stock trend status at the start of each quarter – gave a positive indication on the first day of October for the prospects for the fourth quarter of 2014.

Timeframe summary:

In the Secular (years to decades) timeframe (Figs. 1 & 2 above), the Secular Bear may still be in force as the long-term valuation of the market is simply too high to sustain a new rip-roaring Secular Bull.  In the Cyclical (months to years) timeframe (Fig. 3 above), all major equity markets are in Cyclical Bull territory.  The Bond market returned to Cyclical Bull territory as of February 28th.  In the Intermediate (weeks to months) timeframe (Fig. 4 above), US equity markets moved to Negative status on October 1st.  The quarter-by-quarter indicator gave a positive signal for the 4th quarter:  US equities were in an uptrend, while International equities were in a downtrend at the start of Q4, and either one being in an uptrend is sufficient to signal a higher likelihood of an up quarter than a down quarter.

In the markets:

Markets worldwide were negative for the week, though well off the week’s lows thanks to the jobs-inspired rally on Friday.  LargeCap US indices continued to be relatively stronger, with the S&P 500 retreating a fairly modest      -0.8%.  US MidCaps and SmallCaps continued their underperformance, giving up -1.6% and -1.3% respectively (this was the 5th consecutive negative week for US SmallCaps).  Internationally, the biggest loser was Brazil, shedding    -6.7% ahead of Presidential elections and in reaction to negative Chinese consumption news (see below for more about the Brazil-China connection).  Emerging Markets gave up -2.7% on average, while Developed Markets lost    -3.2% on average.  Emerging Markets have now joined Developed Markets in the negative YTD column, and are now down -0.5% for the year to date, while Developed Markets are down -4.3% for the year to date.  Canada’s TSX pulled back -1.6%, and like US SmallCaps this was its 5th consecutive negative week.

For the month of September, the story was the same as above: everybody lost, but US LargeCaps did best and everything else not so much.   The Dow lost just -0.3%, the LargeCap Nasdaq-100 just -0.8% in September, but it was downhill from there.  US MidCaps gave up -4.7% and US SmallCaps shed -6.2%.  Canada and Developed International retreated -4% and -3.9%.  The biggest loser for the month was the previously high-flying Emerging Markets group, which was lost a huge -7.8%.  The 3rd Quarter as a whole was qualitatively similar: US LargeCaps were up, US MidCaps and SmallCaps were down substantially, and both Developed and Emerging International groups were also down for the quarter.  Canada’s TSX fared better than most non-US indices, losing -1.2% during Q3, but retains a lead over the US for the year to date.

The International Monetary Fund (“IMF”) recently described the US as “rare bright spot” in the global economy.  And the US lived up to that billing in this week’s economic news.  Friday brought a solid jobs report for September, with nonfarm payrolls growing 248,000 and the unemployment rate falling to 5.9%, the lowest since July 2008. The figures for the prior two months were also revised upwards; from 142,000 to 180,000 in August, and 212,000 to 243,000 for July.  Among the few negatives from the jobs report was that average hourly earnings were unchanged, and remain up just 2% from a year earlier, and the labor force participation rate fell to 62.7% from 62.8%, still a long way below pre-recession levels.  The Chicago Purchasing Managers Index (“PMI”) for manufacturing in September was a solid 60.5, while the Institute for Supply Management (“ISM”) data on national manufacturing was 56.6, down from the prior month’s 58.5 but still very good.  The ISM service sector reading came in at 58.6 for last month, also very good.

Canada got two unexpected surprises in economic data this week.  First, July saw no growth in GDP, following six consecutive monthly gains, according to Statistics Canada.  Then on Friday, Statistics Canada reported a surprise trade deficit for August as exports dropped and imports rose by the largest amount in almost two years, to a new all-time high.

Europe is described by the IMF as being stuck in a “new mediocre” condition with high debt, high unemployment and low growth.  The statistics arm of the EU, Eurostat, released its data on unemployment for the euro-18 and the rate remained stuck at 11.5% in August, only down slightly from the 12.0% reading of a year ago. Germany’s jobless rate is just 4.9%, but France is at 10.5%, Italy 12.3%, Spain 24.4% and Greece 27.0%.  The youth unemployment rate remains at shocking levels, especially in the southern tier: 53.7% in Spain, 57.5% in Greece, 44.2% in Italy and 35.6% in Portugal.  Deflation is still very much a danger, with Eurostat reporting just 0.3% annualized inflation, a five-year low.  The composite PMI for the Eurozone (combining manufacturing and services) was 52.0 in September, down from August’s 52.5.  France’s 48.4 was a 3-month low, and Italy’s 49.5 was a 10-month low (above 50 is expansion, below 50 is contraction).

It is noted above that Brazil’s market has taken a beating lately.  Some other Latin American markets have also suffered.  The troubles are in part due to political uncertainties, such as the Brazilian presidential race (the leading candidates are two Socialists each trying to out-promise one another with plans for taxes and anti-business regulations).  However, another little-appreciated cause for concern is that much of Latin America has become highly leveraged to China.  So much so that, to paraphrase an old saying, when China sneezes, Latin America catches a cold.  And it appears that the current slowdown in China may have given some Latin American economies a cold!  This chart, from Bloomberg, shows how much the total trade between major Latin American countries and China now exceeds the trade done with the US (note that both Chile and Brazil now do about double the amount of trade with China compared to their trade with the US).

(sources: Reuters, Barron’s, Wall St Journal, Bloomberg.com, ft.com, guggenheimpartners.com, ritholtz.com, markit.com, financialpost.com, Eurostat, Statistics Canada, Yahoo! Finance, stocksandnews.com, wantchinatimes.com, BBC, 361capital.com, S China Morning Post)

The ranking relationship (graph below) between the defensive SHUT sectors (“S”=Staples [a.k.a. consumer non-cyclical], “H”=Healthcare, “U”=Utilities and “T”=Telecom) and the offensive DIME sectors (“D”=Discretionary [a.k.a. Consumer Cyclical], “I”=Industrial, “M”=Materials, “E”=Energy), is one way to gauge institutional investor sentiment in the market.

The average ranking of Defensive SHUT sectors rose to 8 from the prior week’s 9.5, while the average ranking of Offensive DIME sectors fell to 16.3 from the prior week’s 15.3.  Institutional investors remain cautious, and the Defensive SHUT group ranks higher than the Offensive DIME group ranking by the widest margin in more than a year.

Note: these are “ranks”, not “scores”, so smaller numbers are higher ranks and larger numbers are lower ranks.

Summary:

The US has led the worldwide recovery, and continues to be among the strongest of global markets.  However, the over-arching Secular Bear Market may remain in place even as new highs are reached in the US.

Because we may still be in a Secular Bear, we have no expectations of runs of multiple double-digit consecutive years, and we expect poor market conditions to be a frequent occurrence.  Nonetheless, we remain completely open to any eventuality that the market brings, and our strategies, tactics and tools will help us to successfully navigate whatever happens.